Vote No on
Ann Arbor
Proposal E

In November, voters will be presented with Proposal E. This initiative calls for the creation of a Municipal Energy Utility (MEU).

If approved, this proposal would require the establishment of a municipal electric utility and create a new elected body to govern the city utility. Proponents promise reliable, affordable, green power. They say voting yes won't cost voters anything.

Sound too good to be true? It is.

Clipboard with a paper that reads "Prop E Failing Ann Arbor Voters"
Clipboard with a paper that reads "Prop E Failing Ann Arbor Voters"

What is Ann Arbor Proposal E?

Proposal E
Creation and Governance of a Municipal Electric Utility

Shall Chapter 15 of the Charter be amended to require the City to establish a municipal electric utility and governance structure therefor?

What’s at risk with Proposal E?

  1. Ann Arbor’s Sustainable Future - In November 2024, Ann Arbor voters approved an innovative Sustainable Energy Utility. The SEU is already delivering clean, reliable power in the Bryant neighborhood and city staff anticipates expanding city-wide in 2027. Voter approval of a new MEU could derail the good work of the SEU and divert critical financial resources and staff time. A 2024 University of Michigan research project found a Sustainable Energy Utility had the highest potential to lower prices, increase reliability, lower pollution and benefit underserved communities. Why spend billions investing in antiquated systems of the past when we should invest in the energy systems of the future?

  2. Ann Arbor’s Financial Stability - A 2023 Energy Options Analysis conducted by the City of Ann Arbor found that the cost of acquiring DTE’s distribution assets - excluding substations - was between $281 million to $1.15 billion. Further study (estimated cost $1.7 million) would be needed to refine those estimates, but the true costs to the City would be determined in court.

    Boulder, Colorado spent 10 years and $30 million pursuing municipalization (taxing themselves to fund the effort) and ultimately decided to quit the legal battle. If Ann Arbor prevailed in a similar legal effort, in addition to paying for the transmission assets, the new Municipal Energy Utility would still need to spend an estimated $95,360,000 on the development of ten new substations and $19,175,000 on new transmission lines to connect the substations to the ITC transmission system.‍ Improving the reliability and securing new green energy would be additional. Charting a course without new funding and any understanding of the true costs is reckless. Ann Arbor taxpayers will fund this effort and ratepayers will pay the debt.

  3. Impacts to our Neighbors - One of Ann Arbor’s core guiding principles is equity. Pursuing municipalization has real costs and real tradeoffs. Ann Arbor’s City budget is finite. Prioritizing a fight for municipalization when we have other important community priorities and the social safety net is being decimated by the federal government means Ann Arbor will have fewer resources for the most vulnerable in our community at a time when we need them most.

    If Ann Arbor were to take over DTE’s assets, DTE would no longer pay property taxes. In 2026, DTE contributed $8.5 million dollars in property tax revenue to our local institutions, including $2.9 million dollars to the Ann Arbor Public Schools, $2 million dollars to the City of Ann Arbor, $917,000 to Washtenaw County, and $534,000 to AAATA. Holding corporations accountable should not require the public to be left holding the bill.

Proposal E deserves a failing grade.

At a time when Ann Arbor is making real progress on sustainability, Proposal E endangers our future. Let’s keep fighting DTE. Let’s keep building clean energy. But let’s do it responsibly. Vote NO on Proposal E.

Who are we?

Voters for a Sustainable Ann Arbor is a grassroots coalition of local environmental and community leaders and residents concerned about the risks of Proposal E and Ann Arbor’s sustainability goals. We accept NO corporate donations or support.

We invite you to join us. Talk to your neighbors, share your concerns, and please vote NO on Prop E on or before November 3rd.

Lana Pollack

Lana Pollack

Former State Senator & Environmental Leader

Mike Shriberg

Mike Shriberg

Environmental & Energy Expert, Former City of Ann Arbor Energy Commissioner

A woman with short brown hair, wearing a black blazer and white turtleneck, smiling while sitting indoors.

Janis Bobrin

Environmental Leader, Washtenaw County Water Resources Commissioner, 1989-2012

Laura Rubin

Laura Rubin

Environmental Leader, Director of the Healing Our Waters–Great Lakes Coalition

A man with glasses and white hair smiling on the deck of a boat with water, green hills, and a clear blue sky in the background.

Mike Staebler

Community & Environmental Leader and Wolfpack Member

Matt Grocoff

Matt Grocoff

Founder of the Thrive Collaborative and 2026 Living Future Hero Award Winner

A man with gray hair and blue eyes, speaking or making a facial expression, wearing a dark collared shirt against a plain white wall background.

Dave Konkle

Retired Ann Arbor Energy Office Manager and Nationally Recognized Expert on Municipal Energy Programs and Policies

Conan Smith

President & CEO, Michigan Environmental Council

Charlotte Jameson

Chief Policy Officer, Michigan Environmental Council

Ann Arbor’s Sustainable Future is on the ballot this November - vote NO on Prop E!

Text of "Voters for a Sustainable A2 - Vote NO on Prop E" - Green sign with white text